Primary offering
IP Readiness Assessment
A pre-diligence review that identifies which IP claims are supported by evidence today, where gaps or ambiguity exist, and what would likely surface under fundraising, partnerships, or transactions.
Evidence mapped before conclusions. Unknowns labeled. Scope locked.
Decision support, not authority.
Decision surface
What this delivers
The output is designed to be used internally and with counsel. It is intentionally explicit about support, gaps, and escalation points.
Question
What IP claims can we credibly stand behind today?
Output
A 6–10 page decision brief with scored claims and a fix list.
Use case
Before external representation under scrutiny.
What this is
- An evidence-based assessment of IP claims and obligations
- A readiness check for diligence, fundraising, or partnerships
- A structured way to identify unsupported, weakly supported, or ambiguous IP representations
- A prioritization of what to fix now vs. what can wait
- A clear trail of what is known, unknown, and assumed
What this is not
- Legal advice or a legal opinion
- Patent validity or enforceability analysis
- Infringement or freedom-to-operate opinions
- Claim construction or claim charting
- A substitute for counsel or technical specialists
What you receive
Readiness Brief (6–10 pages)
- Executive summary with top risks and what is safe to represent today
- Asserted IP claims (from deck, data room, or internal statements)
- Claim-by-claim evidence sufficiency: supported / partially supported / unsupported
- Ownership and control signals (presence and obvious gaps only)
- High-level obligation signals and escalation points (no interpretation)
- Diligence stress test: likely questions and what can / cannot be answered today
- Prioritized fix list: fix before diligence / fix if time allows / monitor
- Scope and limits section (explicit)
What success looks like
You can answer, with evidence:
- What IP claims we can confidently stand behind today
- What would break under scrutiny
- What evidence is missing or ambiguous
- What to fix before representation matters
Scope is locked before review.
Evidence is mapped before conclusions. Unknowns are labeled. Output is decision support, not authority.
Request a readiness discussion